← Writing
P24 min read

Defects Product thanks you for (and ones they ignore)

Not every bug earns attention. How I write findings that serve the user and the backlog.

Closed · invalid / duplicateClosed · invalid / duplicateOpen · P1 ownedOpen · needs triageOpen · needs triagenoise

Product ignores defects that sound like taste without consequence. They thank you for defects that name the user impact, the business risk, and a clear next action.

I write the title in user language when I can: what broke for whom. Steps to reproduce stay short. Severity is argued with journey criticality — not personal frustration.

Sometimes the right move is not a defect. It is a story, a question, or a low-priority improvement. Forcing everything into “bug” trains people to mute you.

Hygiene matters: close zombies, merge duplicates, and keep the board trustworthy. A clean backlog makes the good defects visible.

If Engineering returns your tickets often, fix the template and the conversation — not by shouting louder.

defectsproductcommunication

Portrait of Marius Ene, Senior QA Consultant

Marius Ene

Senior Functional QA · user & business focus

Connect with me